perf: move from Buffer to zero-copy BufferSlice
#8574
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
release: performance
✅ Deploy Preview for rspack ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
SyMind
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Use
BufferSlice.The main difference between
BufferSliceandBufferis the prior one is zero-copy if passing from JS runtimes to Rust.However, the second one does not have this benefit. Under the hood,
Bufferleverages thread-safe function to free when it's no longer needed.BufferSlices are just collected by finalizers registered on the fly.BufferSlicecannot be used between functions andBuffercan.Checklist